Abdul Rahman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 817 of 2020
Applicant :- Abdul Rahman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sayeed Saif Ullah,Sufia Saba Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press the application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.9.2022 Sanjeet
Digitally signed by SANJEET KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.09.27 10:35:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rahman
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court