Sagar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous as the applicant did not appear to press the application.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12302 of 2021
Applicant :- Sagar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant/s to press the application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.9.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.26 11:51:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sagar
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/12302/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court