Learned counsel for applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Further submission is that the statement of the victim under Section 200 Cr.P.C. has been recorded. The statements of PW-1 Ashok Kumar and PW-2 Chhote Lal was recorded under Section 202 Cr.P.C. and summons were issued against the applicant on 10.30.2021. It is further submitted that PW-1 and PW-2 are not the eyewitnesses account. As per complainant she was travelling with one Saksham Singh but statement of Saksham Singh was not recorded while he was the eyewitness account. Only just to harass the applicant, this false case has been roped in. It is further submitted that due to this complaint case, there is apprehension of the applicant to arrest. Further submission is that the applicants are ready to cooperate in the trial, therefore no need of custodial interrogation of the applicants, hence, the applicants may be enlarged on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial. If the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will never misuse the same. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the applicants has relied upon the judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Aman Preet Singh vs. C.B.I. through Director, AIR 2021 Supreme Court 4154 .
