Smt. Alka v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC S. 438 as infructuous based on the applicant being present in court, making advance bail unnecessary.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 786 of 2022
Applicant :- Smt. Alka Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Singh,Mayank Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajeev Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Learned counsel for the informant is not present.
Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.9.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.09.21 10:39:13 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Alka
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/786/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court