A single judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution and because it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Discarded the application as infructuous and for want of prosecution. Vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1316 of 2022
Applicant :- Kuldeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant/s to press the application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.9.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.20 16:55:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kuldeep Kumar
State Of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
