Baij Nath v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for lack of prosecution and being infructuous after efflux of time.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 68 of 2020
Applicant :- Baij Nath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Gaurav Sharan Srivastava
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.09.15 09:43:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Baij Nath
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/68/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court