An anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution after the State Law Officer informed the court that the charge sheet had been filed, rendering the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 651 of 2020
Applicant :- Vishal Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Om Narayan Pandey,Ranjit Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press the application even in the revised call.
Learned State Law Officer, Sri Suraj Singh is present and has informed that charge sheet has been filed in the present subject matter and the application has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the State, the application stands dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.9.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.14 09:55:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishal Yadav
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
