Prince Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being listed and not showing interest.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4986 of 2022
Applicant :- Prince Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Yadav,Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant, despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from record that on previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant.
It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.11.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.11.21 15:47:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Prince Kumar
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4986/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court