Single line order dismissing an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC for want of prosecution, as the applicant failed to appear.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10778 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajeev Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears that on previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant to press the instant application for anticipatory bail. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 19.11.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.11.19 14:55:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeev
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
