Dharamwati v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant's anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant alleged arrest by the police had already occurred.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4888 of 2022
Applicant :- Dharamwati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Harshit Gupta,Ramanand Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Sri Harshit Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant submits that accusedapplicant has already been arrested by the police and thus, the present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.9.2022 Anand
Digitally signed by ANAND VERMA Date: 2022.09.20 11:04:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dharamwati
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4888/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court