This order dismisses an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC as having become infructuous, noting the presence of counsel for applicants and the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14966 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajesh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Nuruddin Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vishal Kashyap
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that instant application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous, hence, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.9.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.09.19 16:45:59 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh And 3 Others
State Of U.P And 2 Others
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
