Sunny Oberoi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3507 of 2022
Applicant :- Sunny Oberoi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravikant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of applicant to press this application for anticipatory bail.
Mr. Akhilesh Pandey, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama today in the Court on behalf of first informant, which is taken on record.
Heard learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Akhilesh Pandey, learned counsel for first informant.
As no one has put in appearance on behalf of applicant to press this application for anticipatory bail, it is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.5.2022 Zafar
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunny Oberoi
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Mohammad Zafar Ansari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3507/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court