In this criminal miscellaneous application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the applicant sought protection against arrest for offences including IPCSections 307 and 506. The court perused the record and considered the nature of the offence and cited an Apex Court judgment.
The application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1938 of 2022
Applicant :- Akash And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mushir Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Syed Irfan Ali
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Court does not find any exceptional circumstance warranting interference under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Order Date :- 5.5.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.05.05 17:48:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether any exceptional circumstances warrant the granting of anticipatory bail in the present case.
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be allowed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
How to judge the nature of offence, accusations and complicity of accused.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementReferred¶9
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akash and 2 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
