Imran v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court rejected the applicant's application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. after hearing counsel and perusing the charge sheet and relevant Apex Court judgment.
What the court decided
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3446 of 2022
Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mashaluddin Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Mashaluddin Shah, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Imran in connection with Case Crime No.795 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 283, 332, 353, 336, 342, 436, 307 I.P.C., Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act & Section 3/4 Public Property Prevention Act, 1984 Police Station- Rasulpur, District- Firozabad.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that charge sheet has been submitted against applicant on 16.03.2020 in abovementioned case crime number.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 , this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected .
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant given the circumstances of the case and the Apex Court judgment cited.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Imran
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Mohammad Zafar Ansari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3446/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court