Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as not maintainable. The Court held the applicants had approached it directly instead of the lower court, violating the Full Bench judgment in Ankit Bharti.
Application dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2608 of 2022 Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 22.4.2022/YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.04.26 12:41:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed directly before this Court is maintainable in light of the Full Bench Judgment in Ankit Bharti.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankit Bharti and others Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶6
Ankit Bharti and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2020 (3) ADJ, 575
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kumar and 2 Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
