Single judge of Allahabad High Court rejected anticipatory bail application dismissed by applicant Ashu in a criminal case involving Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2745 of 2022
Applicant :- Ashu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- S.M.Faraz I. Kazmi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 21.4.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.04.23 14:29:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether exceptional circumstances warranting interference in an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. exist in the facts of this case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementReferred¶8
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashu
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajeev Misra
Parties & counsel
