The anticipatory bail application was dismissed on withdrawal by the applicants. The court granted liberty to approach the Sessions Court and apply for bail citing relevant High Court precedent. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the case.
Liberty to approach Sessions Court and apply for anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16891 of 2021
Applicant :- Navrattan Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shekhar Gangal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vijay Kumar Dwivedi
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list.
Heard Sri Shekhar Gangal, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Sri Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 is not present even when the matter has been taken up in revised list.
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of this anticipatory bail application with liberty to approach the learned Sessions Court and apply for anticipatory bail in the light of law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. & Another: 2020(3) ADJ 575.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty without any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 18.2.2022 Naresh
Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR Date: 2022.02.18 17:19:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. & AnotherReferred¶8
2020(3) ADJ 575
Navrattan Kumar
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
