Anticipatory Bail Application rejected due to non-prosecution as no party appeared to press the matter before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14737 of 2021
Applicant :- Rohini Singh@ Nepali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Dutt Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this Anticipatory Bail Application. Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present.
Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.
On the last occasion i.e. on 4.2.2022 when the matter was taken up there was no representation from the applicant even on that date.
The Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.2.2022/nd
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by NISITH DEY Date: 2022.02.19 11:34:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohini Singh@ Nepali
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
Nisith Dey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
