Anticipatory bail application was dismissed because the applicant's counsel failed to appear and the prosecution did not proceed.
Application dismissed due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1577 of 2020
Applicant :- Khurram @ Mohd. Kurram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abdul Mazeed Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Learned AGA is present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 4.7.2022 Shravan
Digitally signed by SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 2022.07.05 11:17:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khurram @ Mohd. Kurram
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
