In an application for anticipatory bail, the High Court dismissed the plea solely because the applicant and the informant failed to appear on the list date, resulting in non-prosecution.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed due to non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1389 of 2020
Applicant :- Vishva Deep Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Mishra,Mahabir Yadav,Najakat Ali
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vivek Sharma
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant and the first informant.
Learned AGA is present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 4.7.2022 Shravan
Digitally signed by SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 2022.07.05 11:17:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail on the merits or dismiss due to non-prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishva Deep Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
