Disposed

Jahangir v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Dec 2022ABAIL/12305/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after the applicant's counsel sought dismissal with liberty to file a regular bail application under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines, directing surrender within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed with liberty to file regular bail; directed surrender within four weeks; no coercive action during that period.

Jahangir Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12305 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Jahangir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 282 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 308 I.P.C., P.S.- Nebua Naurangia, District- Kushinagar.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within a period of four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 6.12.2022 Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.12.06 13:20:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jahangir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jahangir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Guljar and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sachin Verma @ Sachin Singh Vs State of U.P.

Salman and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aamir Vs State of U.P. and Another

Narayan Das Prajapati Vs State of U.P.and Another