Sachin Verma @ Sachin Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time following no objection from the prosecutor.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time following no objection from the prosecutor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9943 of 2022
Applicant :- Sachin Verma @ Sachin Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Akhilesh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant states that by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous, hence, it may be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid request.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.12.2022 Siddhant
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.12.05 18:15:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sachin Verma @ Sachin Singh
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court