Disposed

Smt. Indra Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC28 Nov 2022ABAIL/11929/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the court allowed withdrawal of the bail prayer with liberty to file a regular bail application. The court directed surrender within four weeks and held no coercive action against the applicant during this period.

What did the court decide?

Application treated as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail; surrender directed within four weeks; no coercive action for interim period.

Smt. Indra Devi Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11929 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Smt. Indra Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, learned counsel for applicant and Smt. Ladli Pandey, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 300 of 2022, under Sections 452, 323, 324, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S.- Saiyan, District- Agra.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within a period of four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 28.11.2022 Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.11.28 17:15:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Indra Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Indra Devi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Dilshad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Shukla Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhagwan Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ankit Pachauri Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Sunita Vs State of U.P. and Another