Tapan Jain v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismisses an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution, noting the absence of parties and likely efflux of time.
This single-paragraph order dismisses an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution, noting the absence of parties and likely efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8211 of 2008
Applicant :- Tapan Jain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
None appears except learned A.G.A.
The matter pertains to the year 2008. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous and that is why none is present to press this application.
In view of the above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
However, it is provided that if the cause of action still survives, the applicant is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the order.
Certify the order to the Court concerned immediately.
Order Date :- 28.3.2022 Fhd
Digitally signed by FAHAD NIYAZ Date: 2022.03.30 10:17:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Tapan Jain
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court