Smt Ritu Choudhary v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7001 of 2021
Applicant :- Smt Ritu Choudhary Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in revise list.
No one appears on behalf of applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. for State is present.
As no one appears on behalf of learned counsel for applicant, application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.7.2022 Arshad
Digitally signed by ARSHAD MAHMOOD Date: 2022.07.07 18:21:35 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Ritu Choudhary
Rajeev Misra
Arshad Mahmood
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court