Disposed¶9

Charan Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Apr 2022A482/5560/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition; cognizance order 07.08.2020; charge sheet 25.05.2020; Case Crime No.158 of 2020; Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 332, 353, 504, 506, 188, 269, 270 IPC; Section 3/4 Mahamari Act; Police Station Malpura, District Agra; Upper Chief Judicial Magistrate, First District Agra; liberty to file bail application; fifteen days; decision within ten days; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation; SLP (Cri) No.5191 of 2021; A.G.A. no objection; Allahabad High Court; Manish Kumar, J.; disposed 25.4.2022; Charan Singh.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to move a bail application before the trial court within fifteen days, to be decided by the trial court within ten days thereafter in view of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI; petition disposed of accordingly. ¶9

Charan Singh and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 92

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5560 of 2022 Applicant :- Charan Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Singh Yadav,Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants and learned counsel for the opposite parties as well as perused the record.

¶5

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the impugned cognizance order dted 07.08.2020 as well as charge sheet dated 25.05.2020 alongwith entire proceeding in case crime no.158 of 2020, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 332, 353, 504, 506, 188, 269 and 270 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Mahamari Act, Police Station - Malpura, District - Agra, pending in the court of Upper Chief Judicial Magistrate, First District - Agra.

¶6

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants submits that a liberty may be given to the petitioners/ applicants to file bail application before the learned trial court and the same may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants.

¶8

As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicants / petitioners', it is provided that in case, the petitioners move bail application before the trial court within fifteen days' from today, the same shall be decided within a period of ten days thereafter, in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra).

¶9

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶10

Order Date :- 25.4.2022 S. Kumar

¶11

Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR Date: 2022.04.26 09:40:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Charan Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Charan Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Asim @ Mohammad Asim Vs State of U.P and Another

Zuberul Islam @ Zubair and 6 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Palaku Ram Vs State of U.P.and 7 Others

Devan Vs State of U.P.and Another

Brijesh Mishra and 10 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Smt. Sarita @ Khushboo and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another