The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition because no one appeared for the parties and the learned A.G.A. for the State mentioned the matter had become infructuous due to lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2451 of 2003
Petitioner :- Smt. Anita Respondent :- Lomesh Kumar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,S.M. Abbas Naqvi,Sanjay Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate,R.B. Sharma
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case is taken up in the revised call. None appears either on behalf of the petitioner or respondent no.1. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It seems that due to lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous and the petitioner has no interest in the prosecuting the case.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.11.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.11.16 18:08:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Anita
Lomesh Kumar
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
