Disposed

Pawan Saini and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 Jul 2022A482/432/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 CrPC was admitted for filing a filing of notice to both parties and consideration of the matter in the Bench order on array of intervenors and High Court jurisdiction. Bench fixed 6 days for filing of counter-affidavit and array of intervenors.

What did the court decide?

Application admitted. Notice to parties to be served. 6 days extended to file counter-affidavit or array of intervenors before this court.

Pawan Saini and Another Vs State of U.P. and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 432 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Pawan Saini And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amrit Shanker Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 314 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 354?k] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk fldUnjk] ftyk vkxjk esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 30&10&2020 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 4878 lu 2021] tks Lis’ky lh0ts0,e0] vkxjk ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 31&5&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; lqyg le>kSrk gks tkus dh laHkkouk gS] blfy, bl izdj.k dks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds lqyg le>kSrk dsUnz dks jsQj dj fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks mudk ;g vuqjks/k Lohdkj fd, tkus esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA

¶9

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr bl izdj.k esa ;g funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd nksuksa i{kdkj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj ekeys dks lqyg le>kSrk ds }kjk fuLrkfjr djus ds fy, vkosnu i= izLrqr djsaA ;fn izdj.k dks lqyg le>kSrk ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr djus ds laca/k esa vkosnu i= voj U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnu i= izLrqr fd, tkus dh frfFk ls ,d lIrkg ds vUnj ml ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tk; rFkk lacaf/kr ehfM,s’ku lsUVj }kjk mls 5 ekg ds vUnj fuLrkfjr dj fn;k tk;A

¶10

vkt ls 6 ekg rd vkosndx.k ds fo:) mijksDr okn esa leLr vfxze dk;Zokgh LFkfxr jgsxhA

¶11

;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k foQy gksrh gS rks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; mijksDr okn esa vkosndx.k ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj fof/kd dk;Zokgh djus dks Lora= gS] vkSj ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k lQy gksrh gS rks vkosndx.k ehfM,s’ku lsUVj dh ml vk[;k ds lkFk bl U;k;ky; esa vkus dks Lora= gSaA

¶12

mijksDr vH;qfDr ds lkFk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶13

fn0 % 5&7&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶14

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.05 17:12:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pawan Saini and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Saini and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sughar Singh Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shamim Ahmad and 5 Others Vs State of U.P.and Another

Zafar Khan and 3 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Santosh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

M/S.D. Pauls Capital Limited and 3 Others Vs State of U.P.and Another