Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Section 482 application, the Allahabad High Court considered a plea to quash an intermediate appellate order requiring the applicant to pay Rs. 50,000 as costs. The court observed that a main substantive appeal to challenge the impugned order is already pending and accepted the argument that no distinction can be made at this stage. Consequently, the court left the application pending for
What the court decided
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1696 of 2022
Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] okn la0 1072 lu 2018] vUrxZr /kkjk 125 na0iz0la0 esa vij iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] dksVZ ua0 4] tkSuiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 26&8&2020 ,oa okn la0 30 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 126 na0iz0la0 esa vij iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] ifjokj U;k;ky;] dksVZ ua0 4] tkSuiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 23&12&2020 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd dks fcuk lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj iznku fd, gq, iz’uxr fu.kZ; ikfjr fd, x, gSa;k gS] ftlds }kjk foi{kh dks dqy :0 5]000@& Hkj.k iks"k.k HkRrk izfrekg vnk djus dk funsZ’k fn;k x;k gS] bl izdkj iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ,oa rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr ugha gSa] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gSa ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;k rFkk ;g dFku fd;k fd vkosnd dks mDr ,di{kh; fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k dks okil ysus gsrq lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; esa gh vkosnu i= nsus dk vuqrks"k miyC/k gSA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the application under Section 482 CrPC to quash the impugned order and its direction for payment of costs, specifically at the intermediate stage.
Whether an interim order should be passed to enhance the time limit for presenting the appeal before the High Court.
Whether the present stage of the proceedings provides sufficient grounds for quashing the impugned appellate order made by the High Court at Lucknow.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SANTOSH KUMAR
Coram
HON'BLE GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/1696/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court