In this application under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, based on the discretion exercised earlier, allowed the applicant to attach a copy of the impugned order to the record of the lower court in a cheating and forgery case.
Order relaxed to attach the impugned order to the record of the lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4047 of 2022
Applicant :- Sunil Kumar And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raksha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
lwph iqujhf{krA
mHk; i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
bl U;k;ky; ds vkns’k fn0 11&5&2022 dks bl izdj.k dks ehfM,s’ku ,.M dkUlhfy,’ku lsUVj dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk vkosndx.k dks 15 fnu ds vUnj :0 40]000@& tek djus dk funsZ’k fn;k x;k FkkA
dk;kZy; vk[;k fn0 26&5&2022 ds vuqlkj vkosndx.k }kjk vHkh rd mDr /kukf’k ugha tek dh x;h gSA
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr Hkh ugha gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa ifjokn okn la0 244@IX@2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 323 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ksk vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj] ftyk ckWnk tks flfoy tt] tw0fM0@,Q0Vh0lh0] ckWnk ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc izsf"kr fd;k tk;A
fn0 % 7&7&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.07 16:24:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order in a cheating and forgery case is required to be remand by the High Court pursuant to Section 3 of Criminal Procedure Code and the discretion exercised by the court below.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of U.P. vs. Vinayan PanditReferred¶9
State of U.P. vs. Vinayan Pandit (2021)
Schedule 244 of CrPCReferred¶9
Sunil Kumar And 4 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
