Harihar Prasad Pathak v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge quashed the impugned order refusing to quash an FIR and the subsequent order not directing Police Station recovery. Relying on Section 482 Cr.P.C., the court held the proceedings were void and baseless and granted the applicant's request to quash them and direct a remand to the Police Station.
What did the court decide?
The impugned orders dated 5-3-2021 and 16-12-2021 were quashed, and the Police Station was directed to initiate recovery proceedings.