The High Court recorded the applicant's indorsement that a certain order remained unreviewed by the High Court and was pending, and directed the High Court in a separate file to quash said order.
A direction was issued to the concerned High Court to quash the impugned order suo motu.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38994 of 2022
Applicant :- Anil Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Charan Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] okn la0 59 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 323] 504] 506] 308 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk [kqVgu] ftyk tkSuiqj ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1043 lu 2021] tks ,fM’kuy flfoy tt] tw0fM0@ lsosUFk tqMhf’k;y eftLVzsV] tkSuiqj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn, tkus gsrq nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd mijksDr okn voj U;k;ky; esa lu 2021 ls yfEcr gS rFkk dkQh le; O;rhr gksus i’pkr Hkh vHkh rd mldk vfUre :i ls fuLrkj.k ugha gks ldk gS] rFkk mDr okn ds 'kh/kz fuLrkj.k gks ikus dh laHkkouk utj ugha vk jgh gS] blfy, lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks mDr okn dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn;k tk;A
eSaus vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd mijksDr okn dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij ;FkklaHko 18 ekg ds vUnj dj fn;k tk;] fu;r frfFk ij i{kdkj U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gksrs gSa vkSj vuko’;d :i ls okn dks LFkfxr djkrs gSa rks mudh mifLFkfr lqfuf’pr djus ds fy, muds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj vko’;d dk;Zokgh dh tk,xhA
bu funsZ’kks ds lkFk ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr djsA
fn0 % 13&12&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.14 16:09:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was empowered to exercise suo motu jurisdiction for consideration of an unreviewed order from a subordinate court.
Whether a reference to review a subordinate court order by the High Court on suo motu basis was justified.
Anil Yadav
State Of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
