Partly allowed

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Dec 2022A482/16627/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 CrPC regarding measures under the Juvenile Justice Act, the High Court, judicially stopping the execution of a High Court order to remove the minor, allowed the ward to remain with his grandmother, citing her companionship and lack of moral influence.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 CrPC filed to restrain execution of High Court order directing removal of ward; granted; directed to be satisfied by Patna High Court.

Vijay Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16627 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 233 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 363 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk lgim] ftyk gkFkjl esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 25&12&2020 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 63 lu 2021 esa U;kf;d eftLVzsV] lknkckn] ftyk gkFkjl }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 25&1&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

U;k;ky; ds vkns’k fn0 11&11&2022 ds vuqikyu esa dfFkr ihfM+rk Jherh lq/kk U;k;ky; esa O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr gSA mldh f’kuk[r vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us dhA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd Jherh lq/kk orZeku esa vius ifr fot; dqekj ds lkFk esa jg jgh gS] blfy, mldh f’kuk[r og dj jgs gSaA

¶9

Jherh lq/kk us U;k;ky; ds le{k c;ku fn;k fd orZeku esa mldh vk;q 22 o"kZ gS] vkt og vius ifr fot; dqekj ds lkFk U;k;ky; esa vk;h gS] mlds firk us fot; dqekj ds fo:) xyr izkFkfedh ntZ djk;h gS] og vius ifr fot; dqekj ds lkFk viuh ethZ ls jkth&[kq’kh ds lkFk jg jgh gS] og eqdnek ugha pykuk pkgrh gS] og vkt viuh ifr ds lkFk gh okil tkuk pkgrh gS] og viuk ,d fyf[kr c;ku Hkh U;k;ky; ds le{k gLrk{kj djds izLrqr dj jgh gSA

¶10

mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa dfFkr ihfM+rk ds c;ku ,oa lgefr dks utjvankt ugha fd;k tk ldrkA mlus Li"V dgk gS fd og vkosnd fot; dqekj ds lkFk jguk pkgrh gS] mls fdlh us tksj tcjnLrh esa ugha j[kk x;k gSA

¶11

pwWfd dfFkr ihfM+rk ckfyx gS blfy, og tgkW vkSj ftlds lkFk tkuk pkgs] tkus ds fy, Lora= gSA dksbZ Hkh O;fDr mlds ekxZ esa ,oa mlds 'kkfUriwoZd vius llqjky esa ifr ds lkFk jgus esa fdlh Hkh fdLe dh dksbZ ck/kk mRiUu ugha djsxkA

¶12

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr okn dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkrh gSA

¶13

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A

¶14

fn0 % 12&12&2022

¶15

ds0lh0flag

¶16

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.12 17:51:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sapna Chaubey @ Sapna Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Saurabh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Radhika Devi and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vishal Kathpal and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shailendra Agrawal and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Humaiyra (Saas) and 2 Others Vs State of U.P and Another