Allowed

Umashankar Yadav v. State of U.P and 4 Others

Allahabad HC21 Dec 2022A482/31716/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed an order directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. The court held the order lacked sufficient material, was arbitrary, and interfered with the trial process, making it liable to be quashed under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and writ petition petition under Article 226 quashed; order recalled.

Umashankar Yadav Vs State of U.P and 4 Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31716 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Umashankar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] ifjokn okn la0 1851 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 156(3) na0iz0la0] Fkkuk dIrkuxat] ftyk cLrh esa U;kf;d eftLVzsV] cLrh }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 25&11&2020 rFkk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 132 lu 2020 esa lsdsUM ,fM’kuy ls’kUl tt] cLrh }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 27&5&2022 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd us voj U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 156(3) na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k] ftls voj U;k;ky; us izkFkfedh vafdr djus dk vkns’k u nsdj vfirq mls ifjokn ds :i esa ntZ dj fy;k A mDr vkns’k ds fo:) vkosnd us voj U;k;ky; esa vkijkf/kd iqujh{k.k nkf[ky fd;k] fdUrq fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us mls fujLr dj fn;kA bl izdkj fo}ku voj U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ,oa rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr ugha gSa] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gSa ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k fcYdqy lgh ikfjr fd, x, gSa] ldkj.k vkns’k gSa rFkk iz’uxr vkns’kksa esa lHkh rF;ksa dh foLr`r leh{kk dh x;h gSA iz’uxr vkns’kksa esa dksbZ =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS blfy, ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶9

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’kksa dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶10

esjs fopkj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gSa] iz’uxr vkns’k ldkj.k ,oa mfpr gaS] muesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk] vukSfpR;rk ;k izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’kksa dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr vkosnd dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶11

rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’kksa dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶12

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 21&12&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶13

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.22 13:01:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Umashankar Yadav v. State of U.P and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umashankar Yadav v. State of U.P and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kamala Vs State of U.P. and Others

Vijay Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others

Shivam Bajpai Alias Govind Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj Kumar Dwivedi Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Sumit Chaudhary Vs State of U.P. and Another