Allowed

Vijay Singh v. State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad HC20 Dec 2022CRLR/21/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that the Sessions Court correctly convicted the appellant and awarded appropriate punishment under Section 324 IPC and Section 4 of the Bharatiya Vyavastha Pariyojana, no irregularity was found in the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Revision was allowed, the conviction and sentence of the Sessions Court were quashed, and the case was remanded for appropriate trial procedure.

Vijay Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 21 of 2004

¶3

Revisionist :- Vijay Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Nisar Uddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Hari Bans Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

lwph iqujhf{krA

¶6

i{kdkjksa dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA m0 iz0 jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk Jh jkds’k pUnz JhokLro mifLFkr gSaA

¶7

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh] l= ijh{k.k la0 545 lu 2001] vUrxZr /kkjk 307 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk Hkksxuhiqj] ftyk dkuiqj nsgkr esa vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] ,Q0Vh0lh0&1] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 28&10&2003 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 28&10&2003 }kjk vfHk;qDr Hkwi flag dks /kkjk 324 Hkk0na0fo0 ds vUrxZr nks"kh ikrs gq, nks o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ,oa :0 4]000@& vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;] iz’uxr vkns’k ,oa voj U;k;ky; ds ewy vfHkys[k dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶9

fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k ds fo:) bl vk/kkj ij nk;j dh x;h gS fd iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ,oa rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr ugha gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k fcYdqy lgh ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ldkj.k vkns’k gS rFkk iz’uxr vkns’k esa lHkh rF;ksa dh foLr`r leh{kk dh x;h gS iz’uxr vkns’k esa dksbZ =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS blfy, ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶11

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶12

esjs fopkj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gS] iz’uxr vkns’k ldkj.k ,oa mfpr gS] mlesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk] vukSfpR;rk ;k izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr fuxjkuhdrkZ dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶13

rn~uqlkj ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶14

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi rFkk voj U;k;ky; dk ewy vfHkys[k lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 20&12&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶15

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.20 17:05:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Singh v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Singh v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mustakim @ Pappu and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Ankur Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gautam Jain and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Kamala Vs State of U.P. and Others

Shivam Bajpai Alias Govind Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Mamta and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another