An application under Section 482 was dismissed as not pressed on merit. The court recorded a direction allowing future bail consideration if applicants appear within two weeks and file a proper bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27715 of 2022
Applicant :- Chanda Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Madhavendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Sri Madhavendra Singh, learned counsel for applicants, after arguing at some length, on instructions, submits that this application is not pressed on merit and further submits that applicants are desirous to appear before the learned trial Court in pursuance of charge sheet dated 11.01.2022 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 1599 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 0009 of 2022 (State vs. Chanda Devi and another) under Sections 323, 504, 325 IPC, Police Station Gopiganj, District Bhadohi, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi and further prays that learned trial Court be directed to consider their bail application in view of the judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773.
Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection if such a prayer of counsel for applicants is accepted.
In view of the above submissions, the prayer made in this application is rejected.
This application is disposed of only to the extent that in the event, the applicants appear before the learned trial Court in the above referred case within a period of two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be considered in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra).
Order Date :- 29.11.2022 Puspendra
(Serial No. 26 out of 236 fresh cases)
Digitally signed by PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Date: 2022.11.29 18:10:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶5
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Satendra Kumar AntilReferred¶8
Satendra Kumar Antil (supra)
Chanda Devi
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
