The court held that the use of the word 'Nirast' in rejecting the Final Report constitutes an irregularity but not an illegality. The application was disposed of with an observation allowing the applicant to file a bail application within three weeks.
Order disposed with observation allowing applicant to file bail application within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12319 of 2022
Applicant :- Pradeep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Digitally signed by AWADESH KUMAR Date: 2022.11.28 17:47:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Special Judge's use of the word 'Nirast' renders the rejection of the Final Report legally void.
Whether the applicant was entitled to an order treating the nuisance case as a complaint case due to alleged irregularity in the discharge order.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Pradeep
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
