Disposed

Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Dec 2022A482/27119/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant abandoned the request to quash proceedings but sought a direction for expedited disposal of a pending bail application. The High Court directed the offenders to move for bail within three weeks and ordered a stay on coercive processes during that period for expeditious consideration.

What did the court decide?

Direction to appear within three weeks to file bail; order to keep coercive process in abeyance for three weeks for expeditious disposal.

Bablu and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 88

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27119 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Bablu And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Munendra Nath Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kailash Prasad Pandey

¶4

Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Kailash Prasad Pandey, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 19.1.2022 as well as entire proceeding of Session Case No. 744 of 2022 (State Vs. Bablu) arising out of case crime no. 279 of 2021, under sections 354-B, 504, 506 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Shergarh, District Mathura pending in the court of Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mathura.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he is not pressing the application for the prayer of quashing the entire proceeding as well as charge-sheet. He is confining his prayer only for a direction for expeditious disposal of the bail application in view of guidelines propounded in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors, reported in 202 (4) Crimes 139 (SC) case. He further submits that warrant has been issued, hence, some time be granted him to appear before the court below to seek bail.

¶8

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicants, this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of with a direction that applicants may appear before the court below within three weeks and move bail application before the court concerned, their bail application shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. For a period of three weeks the coercive process, if any, shall be kept in abeyance.

¶9

Order Date :- 13.12.2022 Masarrat

¶10

Digitally signed by MASARRAT HUSAIN Date: 2022.12.13 16:42:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rachana Rajauria Vs State of U.P. and Another

Iliyas @ Mullu and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shobha Devi and 3 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Santosh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vinod Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P..and Another

Sumit Gupta and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.