Allowed

Lavkesh and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Apr 2022A482/26129/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed an application under Section 482 CrPC against an order refusing interim maintenance, as the maintenance matter had been settled once for all in a prior High Court order, leaving no claim between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the order refusing interim maintenance; directed the respondent to file an application for setting aside the 2014 judgment.

Lavkesh and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26129 of 2014

¶3

Applicant :- Lavkesh And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,A.R. Nadiwal,Anil Kumar Mishra,Sandeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 83lh lu 2013] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk tudiqjh] ftyk lgkjuiqj ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1305 lu 2014] tks ,0lh0ts0,e0&2] lgkjuiqj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us iwjd 'kiFki= ds lkFk ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV tt] p.Mhx<+ }kjk ,p0,e0,0 fiVh’ku ua0 799 lu 2014 esa ikfjr vkns’k fn0 9&7&2015 dh izfrfyfi nkf[ky dh gS] ftlesa dgk x;k gS fd %& “All matters regarding past, present and future alimony/maintenance have been settled once for all. As per the settlement, the petitioner No. 1 hasw agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 4,50,5000/- to petitioner No. 2. Now the petitioners have no claim against each other whatsoever. bl vk/kkj ij vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; vc dksbZ fookn ugha jg x;k gS] blfy, mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks vikLr dj fn;k tk;A

¶8

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa mDr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶9

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk eq0v0la0 83lh lu 2013] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk tudiqjh] ftyk lgkjuiqj ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1305 lu 2014] tks ,0lh0ts0,e0&2] lgkjuiqj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkrh gSA

¶10

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 18&4&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶11

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.04.19 16:52:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lavkesh and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lavkesh and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Lal Yadav and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Wahid Ansari Vs State of U.P. and Another

Suresh Chandra Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nikhat Khan @ Naz and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chandrabhan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Anjali Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another