Dismissed

Gaurav Giri Goswami and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC31 Aug 2022A482/25545/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 CrPC challenging charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506 IPC and NIA Act, the Single Judge noted the matter was intrusted to the Addl. Public Prosecutor. Relying on Satendra Kumar Antil, the Court observed the High Court can realize the intrusted notice along with the Lower Court's final order, deeming separate stay unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed/intrusted notice passed; High Court to realize intrusted notice along with the impugned order.

Gaurav Giri Goswami and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25545 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Gaurav Giri Goswami And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rupendra Kumar Mishra

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 0011 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk Hkxriqj] ftyk eqjknkckn esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 29&2&2020+ ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 277@9 lu 2021 esa U;kf;d eftLVzsV] Bkdqj}kj] ftyk eqjknkckn }kjk ikfjr izlaKku@rych vkns’k fn0 1&2&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr c;ko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA

¶8

bl Lrj ij] vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosndx.k dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosndx.k dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosndx.k ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA

¶10

mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 31&8&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶11

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.08.31 16:34:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gaurav Giri Goswami and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaurav Giri Goswami and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ananya Agrahari Vs State of U.P and Another

Ujjawal Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ram Dulare Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ateek Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Vs State of U.P.and Another

Mohd. Riyaz Mir Vs State of U.P.and 3 Others