Disposed

Ram Dulare v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC30 Aug 2022A482/13875/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a statable application under Section 482 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. Finding that a prior High Court order requiring inquiry was quashable by the Supreme Court, the court directed the lower court to allow the filing and disposal of the statable application, referring to the Satendra Kumar Antil judgment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned Court to allow the filing and disposal of the statable application for anticipatory bail.

Ram Dulare Vs State of U.P. and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13875 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Dulare Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Monis,Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 0332 lu 2018] vUrxZr /kkjk 354] 324] 504 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk nksgjh?kkV] ftyk em esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 7&7&2019 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 7135 lu 2020] tks U;kf;d eftLVzsV@ ,Q0Vh0lh0] efgyk dksVZ] em ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 1&6&2020 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr c;ko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA

¶8

bl Lrj ij] vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosnd dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosnd dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosnd ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA

¶10

mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 30&8&2022

¶11

ds0lh0flag

¶12

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.08.30 17:51:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Dulare v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Dulare v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Singh Chauhan Vs State of U.P and Another

Abhinav Gupta and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam @ Nand Kishor and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ananya Agrahari Vs State of U.P and Another

Ujjawal Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Delep Kumar Dubey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another