Harishchandra Patel v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Held infructuous due to a subsequent event; application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed.
Held infructuous due to a subsequent event; application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24568 of 2022
Applicant :- Harishchandra Patel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Vikram Singh,Rakesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, states that due to subsequent event this application is rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.11.2022 Puspendra
(Serial No. 21 out of 248 fresh cases)
Digitally signed by PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Date: 2022.11.23 16:40:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Harishchandra Patel
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Puspendra Narayan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court