Ram Khiladi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even through a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even through a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 407 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ram Khiladi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Misra,Viresh Misra Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Kashi Naresh Mishra,Kshitij Shailendra,Ram Prakash Dwivedi,Shiv Sharan Tripathi
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
None appears on behalf of petitioner even in revised call.
In view of above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 22.11.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.11.23 10:41:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Khiladi
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court