The applicant moved under S. 482 CrPC. The division bench expressed disinclination to entertain the petition but allowed withdrawal. Petitioners directed to approach the trial court for bail/anticipatory bail.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw petition and directed to approach the lower court for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23961 of 2022
Applicant :- Anil Pandey And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
After this Court showed its disinclination to entertain this petition, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, the petitioners may approach the court below for getting enlarged on bail/anticipatory bail.
Order Date :- 10.8.2022 Irshad
Digitally signed by IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI Date: 2022.08.29 17:59:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Pandey And 2 Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Irshad Ahmad Siddiqui
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
