Allowed

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Oters

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2022A482/16344/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench allowed the applicant's application under Section 482 CrPC to invoke the High Court's criminal jurisdiction to quash an order by the Sessions Judge invoking inherent powers under Section 311 CrPC against a petition under Section 156(3) CrPC, due to the order being arbitrary and not based on sufficient grounds.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order under Section 311 CrPC is quashed and petition under Section 156(3) CrPC restored; Criminal Jurisdiction invoked.

Bindu Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Oters — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16344 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Bindu Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Oters Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shiv Shanker Yadav

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosfndk dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] izdh.kZ vkosnu i= la0 68 lu 2022 esa ,0lh0ts0,e0&QLVZ] tkSuiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 5&5&2022 rFkk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 68 lu 2022 esa ls’ku tt] tkSuiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 17&5&2022 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosfndk dh vksj ls fo}ku voj U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 311 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ,d vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 156 (3) na0iz0la0 izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftls fo}ku ,0lh0ts0,e0 }kjk ifjokn ds :i esa ntZ dj fy;k x;k rFkk mDr vkns’k ds fo:) vkosfndk }kjk nkf.Md fuxjkuh nkf[ky dh x;h] ftls ftls fo}ku voj U;k;ky; ds iz’uxr vkns’k }kjk fujLr dj fn;k x;k] tks fd leqfpr foospuk ,oa rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr ugha gSa] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gSa ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶8

foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’kksa dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶10

fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gSa] ldkj.k ,oa mfpr vkns’k gSa] muesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk] vukSfpR;rk ;k izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’kksa dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr vkosfndk dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶11

rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr iz’uxr vkns’k dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶12

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A

¶13

fn0 % 25&7&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶14

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.25 17:40:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Oters

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Oters

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musaf Ali Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Mamta Devi Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Manoj Agrawal Vs State of U.P and Another

Matadeen Vs State of U.P. and Another

Malti Devi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Devendra Singh Vs Smt. Champa Devi and Another