Suresh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13041 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13041 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13041 of 2022
Applicant :- Suresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anuj Srivastava,Ravendra Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Sri Ram Raj Pandey, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned AGA for State and Sri Ravendra Singh, the learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
At the very outset, the learned counsel for applicant submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present application with liberty to file fresh inasmuch as there are inherent defects in the present application which cannot be cured by filing a supplementary affidavit or an amendment application.
Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel representing opposite party no.2 have no objection to the prayer, made by learned counsel for applicant.
In view of above, present application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.
The certified copy of the impugned order be returned to learned counsel for the applicant after obtaining a photocopy of the same to be kept on record.
Order Date :- 11.7.2022 Deepika
Digitally signed by DEEPIKA SINGH Date: 2022.07.14 12:52:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh
State of U.P.
Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court