Mauseena v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a Non-Bailable Warrant. The applicant sought liberty to file a bail application before the trial court. The grant was allowed as per Supreme Court guidelines.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to move bail application before trial court within fifteen days; trial court to decide within ten days.
What the court decided
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11367 of 2022
Applicant :- Mauseena Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA and perused the record.
The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the NBW dated 5.1.2018 in Original Suit No. 3853 of 2017 (State Vs. Shameem & others) arising out of Case Crime No. 266 of 2008, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District Saharanpur, pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division/F.T.C., Saharanpur.
After arguing at some length learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the petition and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No. 5191 of 2021 ( Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another ).
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mauseena
Coram
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/11367/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court