The Court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to direct a High Court to entertain a revision application challenging a pending Supreme Court order, pending appropriate permission from the Supreme Court.
The direction to the High Court to entertain a revision application pending Supreme Court permission was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1116 of 2022
Applicant :- Sohaib Saifi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jahangir Haider,Virendra Kumar Sonkar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 1984 lu 2017] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 354] 354d] 354[k Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3(2)5 ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] Fkkuk flgkuh xsV] ftyk xkft;kckn ls mn~Hkwr Lis’ky ls’ku Vzk;y ua0 577 lu 2018] tks Lis’ky tt ,l0lh0@,l-0Vh0 ,sDV] xkft;kckn ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn, tkus gsrq nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks ohfM;ks dkUQZsaflax ds ek/;e ls lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd mijksDr okn voj U;k;ky; esa lu 2018 ls yfEcr gS rFkk yxHkx 3 o"kZ ls vf/kd le; O;rhr gksus ds mijkUr Hkh vHkh rd okn dk vfUre :i ls fuLrkj.k ugha gks ldk gS ,oa mDr okn ds 'kh/kz fuLrkj.k gksus dh laHkkouk utj ugha vk jgh gS] blfy, lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks mDr okn dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd laHkor% ;g foyEc dksfoM ds dkj.k gks ldrk gSA
eSaus vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq,] lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd mijksDr okn dk fuLrkj.k] fnu izfrfnu lquokbZ djds] 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij ;FkklaHko 9 ekg ds vUnj dj fn;k tk;] fu;r frfFk ij i{kdkj U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gksrs gSa vkSj vuko’;d :i ls okn dks LFkfxr djkrs gSa rks mudh mifLFkfr lqfuf’pr djus ds fy, muds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj vko’;d dk;Zokgh dh tk,xhA
bu funsZ’kks ds lkFk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr nk;j ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk
gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr djsA fn0 % 3&2&2022 ds0lh0flag
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC can be made to direct a High Court to interfere with a pending Supreme Court order without its permission.
Whether a High Court can refuse to act under Section 482 CrPC when the matter involves a pending appeal before the Supreme Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohaib Saifi
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
