Allowed

Arvind v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Feb 2022CRLR/215/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Revisional Court held that the Juvenile Justice Act bars ordering the revisionist to visit the juvenile at the juvenile home. The court declared such leave applications void, quashed the lower orders, and directed the revisionist to offer daily support and visit options at every hearing.

What did the court decide?

Court released the revision petition, quashed the Juvenile Home orders, and directed the revisionist to offer daily support and visit options at every stage without reference to the juvenile home.

Arvind Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 49

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 215 of 2022

¶3

Revisionist :- Arvind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sumit Goyal,Shelendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh] eq0v0la0 203 lu~ 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 149] 452] 323] 302] 506] 147] 148 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk 'ksjx<+] ftyk eFkqjk esa fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ] eFkqjk }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 18&11&2021 ,oa nkf.Md vihy la0 112 lu 2021 esa Lis’ky tt@ ikDlks ,sDV] dksVZ ua0 2] eFkqjk }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 24&12&2021 dks vikLr djus gsrq ;ksftr dh x;h gS rFkk mijksDr vijk/k esa tekur ij eqDr djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks ohfM;ks dkUQsZaflax ds ek/;e ls lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

fuxjkuhdrZk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd fuxjkuhdrkZ funksZ"k gS rFkk mls bl vijk/k esa jaft’ku vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gS] ?kVuk ds le; fuxjkuhdrkZ ukckfyx Fkk] fuxjkuhdrkZ fn0 13&8&2021 ls dkjkxkj esa fu:) gSA fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us ;g Hkh rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd fuxjkuhdrZk dks lacaf/kr fd'kksj U;k; cksMZ }kjk fd'kksj vipkjh ?kksf"kr fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk fd’kksj vipkjh dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fof/k fo:) rjhds ls fujLr fd;k x;k gS] ,oa mlds fo:) nk;j QkStnkjh vihy fujLr djus esa Hkh fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk =qfV dh x;h gSA fuxjkuhdrZk ds firk fuxjkuhdrZk dks viuh lqiqnZxh esa ysdj mldk HkyhHkkWfr ns[kjs[k djus dks rS;kj gS] blfy, lacaf/kr fd'kksj U;k; cksMZ dk ;g er fd ;fn fuxjkuhdrZk@fd'kksj vipkjh dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkrk gS rks og Kkr@vKkr vijkf/k;ksa ds lEidZ esa vk ldrk gS vkSj og uSfrd] 'kkjhfjd ,oa euksoSKkfud :i ls [krjs esa iM ldrk gS rFkk mls tekur ij NksMus ls U;k; dk mn~ns'; foQy gks ldrk gS] fujk/kkj gS blfy, fuxjkuhdrZk dks tekur ij NksM fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us fuxjkuhdrZk ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

fuxjkuhdrZk@vfHk;qDr dks lacaf/kr fd'kksj U;k; cksMZ ds }kjk fd'kksj vipkjh ?kksf"kr fd;k tk pqdk gSA Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 dh /kkjk 12 ds izkfo/kku vkKkid izd`fr ds izrhr gksrs gSa rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk fd'kksj vipkjh ds ekeys esa lqlaxr rF; ugha gS] blds vykok i=koyh ij ,slk dksbZ lk{; ;k lkexzh miyC/k ugha gS] ftlls ;g tkfgj gks fd ;fn fuxjkuhdrZk dks tekur ij NksMk tkrk gS rks U;k; dk mn~ns'; foQy gks tk,xk vkSj mldh voeqfDr mldks uSfrd] 'kkjhfjd ;k euksoSKkfud [krjs esa Mky nsxkA bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa iz/kku eftLVzsV] fd'kksj U;k; cksM us fuxjkuhdrZk dk tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus esa =qfV dh gS rFkk mlds f[kykQ nk;j nkf.Md vihy dks fujLr djus esa vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk Hkh =qfV dh x;h gS rFkk iz/kku eftLVzsV] fd'kksj U;k; cksMZ ,oa vihyh; U;k;ky; us mijksDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 12 ds izkfo/kkuksa ij lgh ifjizs{; esa fopkj ugha fd;k gS] blfy, nksuksa iz'uxr vkns'k dk;e j[kus ;ksX; ugha gSa rFkk ;g nksuksa iz'uxr vkns'k vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶10

ifj.kker% ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk voj U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr nksuksa gh iz'uxr vkns'k vikLr fd, tkrs gSa rFkk fuxjkuhdrZk dks tekur ij NksMs tkus dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj fuxjkuhdrZk vjfoUn dks mijksDr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ dh lUrqf"V ij mlds firk cuokjh ds O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij NksM fn;k tk;A

¶12

fn0 % 2&2&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶13

2 of 2

Arvind v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Nigam Vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home at Lucknow

Sakhawat Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Kumar Vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home, U.P. at Lucknow. and others

Vinay Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Lakhvindar Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another