Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel did not appear to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11095 of 2022
Applicant :- Rajesh Gond Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nanhe Lal Tripathi,Satish Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in revised list.
No one appears on behalf of learned counsel for applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
As no one appears on behalf of learned counsel for applicant to press this application, it is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.7.2022 HSM
Digitally signed by HARI SHANKER MISHRA Date: 2022.07.16 16:04:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Gond
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
HARI SHANKER MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
